On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:53:56PM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:42 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:48:02AM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > > > > > > > the only drawback is that the gimp will not work well this way without a > > > > little work on your part. meaning that the directories are not > > > > available until gimp is restarted. > > > > > > > > all of the tools are there to manage your resources however. > > > > > > Ok, that sounds a lot like Windows and you are scaring me. > > > If you had to restart your car every time you had to make a turn, would > > > that be ok? > > > > > > > > hmm, using new directories of brushes in which you have sorted in a way > > that would meet your needs sounds like restarting your car every time > > you make a turn .... > > > > No, having to restart the program when I need to use other patterns. > Say I have 200 patterns with brick walls, 200 with woods, 200 with sand, > 200 with grass,trees, 200 with metals and so on. > > all together, and you can draw some nice things, having so many > different materials to apply to surfaces, but take away half of them and > you can only do so much. > when you want to apply other surfaces, you need to restart the > application - and that's what I think its not acceptable. > well, what were you using and is this still an option to you?
carol _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
