On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ernie Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon Budig wrote: > >> Nathan Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >>>So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a >>>good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked >>>path is antialiased. >> >> This is a good workaround if you know what you're doing and what effect >> you're after. We just cannot make this descision on behalf of the user >> from within Gimp code. > > I can't believe any user actually wants this behavior. > > But assuming some do, they could still get it by untoggling the > Antialiased checkbox in Choose Stroke Style-- > and in fact, I would expect > users who want aliased strokes are already doing that, unaware that the > Antialiased setting makes no difference at all (that I can see, anyway).
I can confirm this bug. If you stroke using a tool (eg paintbrush), the result is antialiased, so I don't understand why the vector stroking isn't.... Actually, it is antialiased. It's just that the antialiasing quality reduces as the stroke width increases. David _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
