Hey people, I didn't start this thread. Don't grind my ass... All I did was mention the obvious features that GIMP doesn't have compared to PS. And I meant competitive *WITH* not *AGAINST* PS. It doesn't have to replace PS -- if GIMP is to eventually have the same utility of PS then it needs the features (and more) that I mentioned.
Why would anyone get their knickers in a bunch about that and start shouting "...put up or shut up..." To be clear, I will *NEVER* work on the innards of GIMP. But I will use it for so long as it is available and meets my current needs. And if you or anybody else doesn't like that idea -- stop making it available. Keep it to yourself. Let only developers use it. Like I give a shit.... ajtiM wrote: > On Sunday 17 January 2010 09:03:32 Norman Silverstone wrote: >>>> There are a few things that GIMP needs to be competitive with PS. >>> Just a few? :) >> Why is it necessary for GIMP to be competitive with PS? > > I agree with the above 100%. Why? I like GIMP, for me is useful and I support > open source. > Who doesn't like it or it is not enough for her/his work there are many other > choices. > > Mitja > -------- > http://starikarp.redbubble.com > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-user mailing list > Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user > _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
