Peter,
On 2010-01-18 20:40, yahvuu wrote: > Philip Rhoades wrote: >> It still seems counter intuitive that opening a JPG (even if it is a >> photo rather than a computer generated image) and immediately saving it >> with 100% "quality" increases the size by 2.5 . . > > so you mean the scale should be different? Like > > 1 .. 10 ... 100 ... 100000 > ^ ^ > | \ extravagant luxury quality for the filthy rich > current "90" > default ?? - that's an odd comment . . > i'm not shure if that would not create even more confusion... I think an "average" user would expect a saved file with a "quality" of 100% to be the same as the original file ie the same specs and file size . . > PS: as Michael Schumacher previously noted, the quality value > is indeed just a number, not a percentage. Yes, but misleading . . Regards, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
