On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Tőkés Ábel <preobazsensz...@freemail.hu> wrote: > I imagine there can be a non-trivial problem with the concept if the linked > layers are not all neighbors: > if there is at least one layer that is not one of the linked, but between > those. In this case, where would the > merged layer be: above or below the middle one?
Honestly, it should just be part of the default feature set in Gimp. I'm a bit shocked that it still isn't. -- Frank Gore www.ProjectPontiac.com _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
