Is there a way to trick 2.6.11 into installing on XP with no SP's installed?
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:03:25 +0000
> From: jack white <jbw9...@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> To: <gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu>
>
>
> Except that 2.6.6 installs without SP2, but 2.6.11 won't install without it.
>
> > Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:20:17 +0100
> > From: Jernej Simon?i? <jernej|s-gm...@eternallybored.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> > To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:21:11 +0000, jack white wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed the 2.6.11 says SP2 is required for Windows XP. I know 2.6.6
> > > works fine without a Service Pack. Does 2.6.11 really require SP2? If
> > > so, is 2.6.7 the first version to require it?
> >
> > I've had the SP2 requirement in the installer for a long time (since GIMP
> > 2.6.2 according to my changelog). GIMP would probably work on XP without
> > any service packs, however I was getting too many weird error reports
> > (which weren't reproducible with SP2 and SP3) that I decided to not bother
> > with anything older (Microsoft also dropped support for XP without SP2 a
> > while ago, and the service packs are a free upgrade, so I see no reason to
> > waste my time with unsupported Windows versions).
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
