hi, > This is "dynamic range" vs. "absolute number of colours". The human > perception varies a lot accoridng to the environment, and, while the human > eye has difficulties with a large number of different colours, it is very > sensible to banding, and different media (film) must support a very large > dynamic range. > > Digital effects filters also eat a lot of resolution. ah! You're talking about internal working values - now *this* I can appreciate - thanks. alan
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. photoshop... Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. phot... Alan Buxey
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. ... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Performance of Gimp ... Alan Buxey
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. photoshop... pixel fairy
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. phot... gimp
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. ... Jon Winters
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. phot... Alan Buxey
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. ... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Performance of Gimp ... Alan Buxey
- Re: Performance of Gimp vs. photoshop... Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero