On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 8:02:08 AM UTC+10, Hugh Gleaves wrote:
>
> My position here is that I do not think Git does a good job of promoting 
> itself.
>
> It uses terminology that confuses newcomers because things with names like 
> "checkout" don't quite mean what they mean in other systems.
>
> Far too much educational material, books and documentation is command line 
> oriented and this is off-putting for many.
>

I totally agree with this.

I've tried to 'crack' it many times. I can understand the basics absolutely 
fine, but as soon as something out of the ordinary happens I'm completely 
lost. I don't know the correct terminology to Google the solution. If I do 
find something that sounds similar to my situation, then the solution is 
way beyond my level and though I try I stuff it up and make an even bigger 
mess. I've been through so many rabbit holes of endless Googling.

I've been stuck at this level for months now - there seems to be a huge 
leap between knowing the basics to the next level of understanding. It 
feels like the difference in learning a few phrases of another language one 
day then all of a sudden being forced to have in-depth conversations the 
next.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to