On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us> wrote:
> The second commit makes the expansion less strict about the location
> of note refs.  In his initial mail introducing 'git notes', Johan says
> that note refs should live under 'refs/notes' [1].  This seems like a
> good place for local notes, but note refs from remote repos should
> probably live somewhere else (e.g. 'refs/remote-notes/' or
> 'refs/remotes/<name>/notes/'.  In the initial thread there are a few
> messages talking about looking up reverse mappings under 'refs/notes/',
> but this seems to all have been before the 'refs/notes/<namespace>/'
> stage.  If I'm missing a good reason to keep everything under
> 'refs/notes/', feel free to ignore the second patch.

This has been discussed a couple of times on this list, but it never
resulted in any actual changes. Read up on this thread to get some
context:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/160503


...Johan

-- 
Johan Herland, <jo...@herland.net>
www.herland.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to