On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:53 PM, W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:58:37PM +0200, Johan Herland wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us> wrote: >> > If I'm missing a good reason to keep everything under >> > 'refs/notes/', feel free to ignore the second patch. >> >> This has been discussed a couple of times on this list, but it never >> resulted in any actual changes. Read up on this thread to get some >> context: >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/160503 > > Thanks for the pointer, it looks like there are a bunch of good ideas. > I assume the lack of changes was due to nobody having the > time/inclination to implement > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/160655
Yes, I think time/inclination probably has a lot to do with it. Also, I forgot to link to the largest mailing list thread that discusses these changes in _much_ more detail: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/165799/focus=165885 As you can see, the discussion quickly balloons into something much larger than a simple discussion of where remote notes should be located... That said, your patch 2/2 might be an acceptable stopgap measure for the time being, and then we can reevaluate it if/when we implement a larger ref restructuring. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <jo...@herland.net> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
