On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: > >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining: > >> > >> --rfc:: > >> Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given. > >> > > Would: > > Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` > > be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here.
My patch used "Alias for"; if you prefer "Shorthand for" I'm indifferent. :)
