On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:55:50PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: > > >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining: > > >> > > >> --rfc:: > > >> Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given. > > >> > > > > Would: > > > > Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` > > > > be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here. > > My patch used "Alias for"; if you prefer "Shorthand for" I'm > indifferent. :)
Or maybe "Act as if...". -Peff
