On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> wrote: > On 12/07, Duy Nguyen wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> wrote: >> > Convert 'create_simplify()' to use the pathspec struct interface from >> > using the '_raw' entry in the pathspec. >> >> It would be even better to kill this create_simplify() and let >> simplify_away() handle struct pathspec directly. >> >> There is a bug in this code, that might have been found if we >> simpify_away() handled pathspec directly: the memcmp() in >> simplify_away() will not play well with :(icase) magic. My bad. If >> :(icase) is used, the easiest/safe way is simplify nothing. Later on >> maybe we can teach simplify_away() to do strncasecmp instead. We could >> ignore exclude patterns there too (although not excluding is not a >> bug). > > So are you implying that the simplify struct needs to be killed? That > way the pathspec struct itself is being passed around instead?
Yes. simplify struct was a thing when pathspec was an array of char *. At this point I think it can retire (when we have time to retire it) -- Duy
