Hi Junio,

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > The scripted version of the interactive rebase already does that.
> 
> Sensible.  I was wondering why this wasn't there while reviewing
> 10/34, comparing the two (this is not a suggestion to squash this
> into the previous step).

It's a bit of a historical wart, as I discovered test breakages only long
after implementing the fixup/squash commands (as you may have guessed, I
implemented the commands one after another, fixing things as discovered by
the test suite; it took something like a month until I got the
rebase--helper based rebase -i to pass t3404).

In the end, I decided not to squash this into 10/34 because it seemed to
be a significant enough change to merit its own commit.

Ciao,
Dscho

Reply via email to