On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:53:04AM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 10:07 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> > diff --git a/builtin/grep.c b/builtin/grep.c
> > index e83b33bda..c4c632594 100644
> > --- a/builtin/grep.c
> > +++ b/builtin/grep.c
> > @@ -1176,6 +1176,12 @@ int cmd_grep(int argc, const char **argv, const char
> > *prefix)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!use_index) {
> > + if (seen_dashdash)
> > + die(_("--no-index cannot be used with revs"));
>
> There is a subsequent check that prints "--no-index or --untracked cannot be
> used with revs." - maybe we should just expand this part to incorporate that
> case. (That is, write `if (!use_index || untracked)` instead of `if
> (!use_index)`.) This also allows us to preserve the error message, which
> might be useful for someone using a translated version of Git.
I wasn't sure if we wanted to treat "untracked" in the same way.
Certainly we can catch the error here for the seen_dashdash case, but is
it also the case that:
echo content >master
git grep --untracked pattern master
should treat "master" as a path?
-Peff