"Eric S. Raymond" <e...@thyrsus.com> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>: >> fsck_ident() in fsck.c rejects anything but " [1-9][0-9]* " after >> the author and committer ident (i.e. the timestamp has to be >> integral number of seconds since the epoch, not before it, nor >> with fractional seconds). > > Is this architecturally significant? It sounds like another > implementation detail.
No. If you create a commit object that violatse it and have 47 million existing users pull such a history, they not be able to use such a history with the version of Git they have. Don't go there. As somebody else mentioned, in distributed environment millisecond timestamps won't have much meaning, so it looks like a very low priority to me from Git's perspective. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
