Thomas Berg <merlin...@gmail.com> writes: > If roundtripping to other version control systems is an argument, > adding sub-second timestamps could potentially create as many problems > as it solves. For example, I've been using the hg-git bridge, and it > supports roundtripping between git and mercurial today (for most repos > I've tried anyway). I may have missed something,...
What I left unsaid was that the use of extra subsecond resolution is optional. I do not see any reason for *us* to create commits with subsecond resolution when we are writing native commits. Only when the end users and/or import tools tell us to. If you assume all foreign SCM you care about have at least one second resolution, you would be fine. Having said all that, given that this, if implemented, would not be used by us but only for recording other people's times, and that the set of meta information we record in our history will never be superset of everybody else's anyway, I do not see much point in supporting subsecond timestamps in the first place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
