Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
>
> "git check-ref-format --branch $name" feature was originally
> introduced (and was advertised) as a way for scripts to take any
> end-user supplied string (like "master", "@{-1}" etc.) and see if it
> is usable when Git expects to see a branch name, and also obtain the
> concrete branch name that the at-mark magic expands to.
>
> Emphasize that "see if it is usable" role in the description and
> clarify that the @{...} expansion only occurs when run from within a
> repository.
>
> [jn: split out from a larger patch]
>
> Helped-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
> ---
Missing sign-off, unlike the other two, intended?
I'll take these three to replace what I tentatively queued, not
necessarily because I like the change in 1/3 better, but because
these are explained much better; besides I prefer a version that at
least two people deeply looked at.
Thanks.
