Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:
>> From: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
>>
>> "git check-ref-format --branch $name" feature was originally
>> introduced (and was advertised) as a way for scripts to take any
>> end-user supplied string (like "master", "@{-1}" etc.) and see if it
>> is usable when Git expects to see a branch name, and also obtain the
>> concrete branch name that the at-mark magic expands to.
>>
>> Emphasize that "see if it is usable" role in the description and
>> clarify that the @{...} expansion only occurs when run from within a
>> repository.
>>
>> [jn: split out from a larger patch]
>>
>> Helped-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
>> ---
>
> Missing sign-off, unlike the other two, intended?
Oops.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>
> I'll take these three to replace what I tentatively queued, not
> necessarily because I like the change in 1/3 better, but because
> these are explained much better; besides I prefer a version that at
> least two people deeply looked at.
Okay, thanks. I'll add the rest of the change as a patch on top. :)
Thanks,
Jonathan
