On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Elijah Newren <new...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> the_repository is special. One of the special things about it is that >> it does not allocate a new index_state object like submodules but >> points to the global the_index variable instead. As a global variable, >> the_index cannot be free()'d. >> >> Add an exception for this in repo_clear(). In the future perhaps we >> would be able to allocate the_repository's index on heap too. Then we >> can remove revert this. > > "remove revert"?
It's obvious that double negatives are below me. I'm going to the next level with double positives! "remove" should be removed. -- Duy
