On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:47 AM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When a user is registered in a Windows domain, it is really easy to
> obtain the email address. So let's do that.
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
> ---
> diff --git a/compat/mingw.c b/compat/mingw.c
> @@ -1826,6 +1826,11 @@ static char *get_extended_user_info(enum
> EXTENDED_NAME_FORMAT type)
> +char *mingw_query_user_email(void)
> +{
> + return get_extended_user_info(NameUserPrincipal);
> +}
> diff --git a/ident.c b/ident.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ const char *ident_default_email(void)
> + } else if ((email = query_user_email()) && email[0]) {
> + strbuf_addstr(&git_default_email, email);
> + free((char *)email);
If query_user_email(), which calls get_extended_user_info(), returns
NULL, then we do nothing (and don't worry about freeing the result).
However, if query_user_email() returns a zero-length allocated string,
then this conditional will leak that string (due to the email[0]
check). From patch 2/3, we see in get_extended_user_info():
+static char *get_extended_user_info(enum EXTENDED_NAME_FORMAT type)
+{
+ if (GetUserNameExW(type, wbuffer, &len)) {
+ char *converted = xmalloc((len *= 3));
+ if (xwcstoutf(converted, wbuffer, len) >= 0)
+ return converted;
that it may possibly return a zero-length string (due to the ">=0").
Do we care about this potential leak (or is GetUserNameExW()
guaranteed never to return such a string)?
