Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > Each "wait" will try to collect all processes, but may be interrupted by > a signal. So the correct number is actually "1 plus the number of times > the user hits ^C".
Yeah and that is not bounded. It is OK not to catch multiple ^C that races with what we do, so having ane extra wait in the clean-up procedure after receiving a signal like you suggested would be both good enough and the cleanest solution, I think. Thanks.
