Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > The usual incantation is "git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master". Is > the code review creation push that uses a different branchname from > the branch the integrator pulls what seems backward, or is it the need > to specify a refname at all on the command line? > > I agree that a "[branch "master"] pushremote" configuration would be > handy. pushremote instead of remotepush to be less surprising to > people who have already seen pushurl.
I'd actually see this as Gerrit being weird. If it wants to quarantine a commit destined to the "master" branch, couldn't it just let people push to "master" and then internally update "for/master" instead? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
