Taylor Blau <m...@ttaylorr.com> writes:

>   - t/t3005: this script calls the variable '$new_line', but could be
>     renamed to LF and then removed in a second patch

It is worse than that, isn't it?

If it used $new_line, then it would probably have been a good idea
to somehow make a separate patch related to this one and make a
series about "use $LF from test-lib", but ever since its beginning
at 0f64bfa9 ("ls-files: fix pathspec display on error", 2011-08-01),
$new_line is assigned once but never used in the script.

Somebody may want to go clean-up the use of various $sq and $SQ
locally defined by giving a unified $SQ in test-lib.sh, by the way.

-- >8 --
Subject: t3005: remove unused variable

Since the beginning of the script, $new_line variable was never used.
Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
---
 t/t3005-ls-files-relative.sh | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t3005-ls-files-relative.sh b/t/t3005-ls-files-relative.sh
index 209b4c7cd8..583e467683 100755
--- a/t/t3005-ls-files-relative.sh
+++ b/t/t3005-ls-files-relative.sh
@@ -7,8 +7,6 @@ This test runs git ls-files with various relative path 
arguments.
 
 . ./test-lib.sh
 
-new_line='
-'
 sq=\'
 
 test_expect_success 'prepare' '

Reply via email to