Hi Junio
On 03/10/2019 06:04, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with
'-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
'+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
[...]
* pw/rebase-i-show-HEAD-to-reword (2019-08-19) 3 commits
- sequencer: simplify root commit creation
- rebase -i: check for updated todo after squash and reword
- rebase -i: always update HEAD before rewording
(this branch is used by ra/rebase-i-more-options.)
"git rebase -i" showed a wrong HEAD while "reword" open the editor.
Will merge to 'next'.
That's great, thanks
* ra/rebase-i-more-options (2019-09-09) 6 commits
- rebase: add --reset-author-date
- rebase -i: support --ignore-date
- sequencer: rename amend_author to author_to_rename
- rebase -i: support --committer-date-is-author-date
- sequencer: allow callers of read_author_script() to ignore fields
- rebase -i: add --ignore-whitespace flag
(this branch uses pw/rebase-i-show-HEAD-to-reword.)
"git rebase -i" learned a few options that are known by "git
rebase" proper.
Is this ready for 'next'.
Nearly, but not quite I think cf [1]. Also I'm still not convinced that
having different behaviors for --ignore-whitespace depending on the
backend is going to be helpful but maybe they are close enough not to
matter too much in practice [2].
[1]
https://public-inbox.org/git/20190806173638.17510-1-rohit.ashiwal...@gmail.com/T/#m965ce1f09d1d1b8010c04db0eabd4b19ce99fe82
[2]
https://public-inbox.org/git/20190806173638.17510-1-rohit.ashiwal...@gmail.com/T/#m94e059c18b7bbcc721d12b190bd4aaecc5e8d591
