Phillip Wood <phillip.wood...@gmail.com> writes: >> * ra/rebase-i-more-options (2019-09-09) 6 commits >> ... >> Is this ready for 'next'. > > Nearly, but not quite I think cf [1]. Also I'm still not convinced > that having different behaviors for --ignore-whitespace depending on > the backend is going to be helpful but maybe they are close enough not > to matter too much in practice [2]. > > [1] > https://public-inbox.org/git/20190806173638.17510-1-rohit.ashiwal...@gmail.com/T/#m965ce1f09d1d1b8010c04db0eabd4b19ce99fe82
OK, so I'll leave a note that this needs to consider existing GIT_COMMITTER_DATE environment variable, etc, with a reference to <5adde732-173b-d24d-d23f-bb4d04307...@gmail.com>. A URL to public-inbox.org is good, but that is because those who do not use public-inbox.org (or after the site goes out of service) can still identify exactly which message you are referring to if you use the https://public-inbox.org/git/$message_id_without_brackets format. Unlike that form, the format you used only identifies the thread starter, and without public-inbox.org in service, a reader cannot tell which message in the thread you are referring to, even if the reader had full mailing list archive. IOW, I would have appreciated if the above reference were done like so: https://public-inbox.org/git/5adde732-173b-d24d-d23f-bb4d04307...@gmail.com/ Thanks.
