2014-02-08 20:59 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Ralf Thielow <ralf.thie...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2014-02-08 20:22 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >>> "verberge keine aufgepfropften Commits" seems much more in the spirit of >>> the original terminology. "verbirgt keine Commits mit künstlichen >>> Vorgängern" is plainly wrong anyway since it is not the commits _with_ >>> grafts which are hidden but rather the commits _provided_ by grafts. >>> >> >> Maybe "verbirgt keine Commits auf Basis künstlicher Vorgänger"? > > No. If at all "Verbirgt keine künstlichen Vorgänger" or "keine > künstlichen Vorgängercommits" since the "künstlicher Vorgänger" _is_ the > commit that is hidden: the graft, if we are being totally meticulous, is > the list of artificial parents for a given commit. The option, when > activated, hides those artificial parents. > > And "Do not" is not "Does not", so "Verbirgt" seems also wrong as it > likely should be "Verberge" (imperative). But then it would depend on > the overall style in which this imperative is usually translated. >
Oh, I seem to have misunderstood the thing :/ So I'd be "verbirgt keine künstlichen Vorgänger-Commits". For short descriptions of options we currently don't use the imperative. This should be changed. Thanks > -- > David Kastrup -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
