On 04/02/2014 09:06 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu>
> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu>
>> ---
>> lockfile.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lockfile.c b/lockfile.c
>> index 852d717..c06e134 100644
>> --- a/lockfile.c
>> +++ b/lockfile.c
>> @@ -85,6 +85,14 @@ static void remove_lock_file_on_signal(int signo)
>> raise(signo);
>> }
>>
>> +static void reset_lock_file(struct lock_file *lk)
>> +{
>> + lk->fd = -1;
>> + strbuf_setlen(&lk->filename, 0);
>> + strbuf_setlen(&lk->staging_filename, 0);
>
> strbuf_reset() perhaps?
Thanks, Eric. For some reason I always have it in the back of my head
that strbuf_reset() frees the memory associated with the strbuf, but of
course that is strbuf_release() that I'm thinking of.
I just fixed all strbuf_setlen(..., 0) -> strbuf_reset(...) throughout
the patch series. The fix will be in the re-roll.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhag...@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
