Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> +static int open_staging_file(struct lock_file *lk)
> +{
> + strbuf_setlen(&lk->staging_filename, lk->filename.len);
> + strbuf_addstr(&lk->staging_filename, ".new");
> + lk->fd = open(lk->staging_filename.buf, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL,
> 0666);
> + if (lk->fd < 0) {
> + return -1;
> + }
All the other "if (lk->fd < 0)" calls reset_lock_file(lk). Is it an
intentional omission that this one does not?
If so, please drop the extraneous {} around the single "return -1"
statement.
I also share the same puzzlement in Peff's review.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
