On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> Do you mean that "git merge" should be aware of what changes you have >> already cherry-picked? >> >> It isn't, and that's deliberate > > That said, when today's "git merge" fails to resolve conflicts, it's > easily possible that we could do better at resolving the merge by > walking through both sides and understanding what happened.
It would help if cherry-pick history where recorded somewhere (beyond the reflog)... Cherry-picks should record two parents, like merges. (Of course, it does no good to know about an unreachable parent, when a commit with two parents is pushed to a repo that doesn't have one of those parents, which can happen when topic branches aren't pushed upstream.) Nico -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
