Mike Stump wrote: > On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It isn't, and that's deliberate > > Deliberate bugs are still bugs. Yes, you and I disagree about what the behavior should be. I actively prefer the current behavior over the one you proposed, unless I'm misunderstanding the one you proposed. As I understand it, there would be no way to undo the mistake of cherry-picking a change that didn't belong on "maint". You said that 3-way merge doesn't fit your idea of what a merge is. It does fit mine. I'm even slightly against there being an option for the 'git cherry' based thing. I think it would be a support burden. But if someone else wants to do the work of implementing it, I wouldn't stop them (and would instead just help make sure the documentation is crystal clear). Hoping that clarifies, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
