Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: > Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> > --- > t/t7508-status.sh | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/t/t7508-status.sh b/t/t7508-status.sh > index 8ed5788..4989e98 100755 > --- a/t/t7508-status.sh > +++ b/t/t7508-status.sh > @@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ test_expect_success 'status with > status.displayCommentPrefix=false' ' > test_i18ncmp expect output > ' > > +test_expect_success 'status -v' ' > + git diff --cached >>expect &&
This makes the test rely on the previous one succeeding. Do we care, or is reproducing what ought to be in 'expect' at this step too expensive? > + git status -v >output && > + test_cmp expect output > +' > + > test_expect_success 'setup fake editor' ' > cat >.git/editor <<-\EOF && > #! /bin/sh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
