On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudshekha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Matthieu Moy > <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: >> Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudshekha...@gmail.com> writes: >>> +test_expect_success 'reset - in the presence of file named - with previous >>> branch' ' >>> + echo "Unstaged changes after reset:" >expect && >>> + echo "M -" >>expect && >>> + echo "M 1" >>expect && >> >> Here and elsewhere: why not >> >> cat >expect <<-EOF >> Unstaged changes after reset: >> M - >> M 1 >> >> ? > I was confused whether to use cat or echo. I thought using cat will > disrupt the indentation as the EOF needs to be on a single line. This > is why I chose echo. Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Here-docs are easier to compose and read than individual 'echo' statements for multi-line content. The '-' in front of EOF allows you to indent the entire body. Even better, use -\EOF to signify that you don't expect any interpolation to occur within the body. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
