Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> Your case above is actually better spelled as test_expect_code, but
> there are more complex one-off cases that I solved using a {} block.
Just for the record, test_expect_code expects only one possible good
exit status and it does not allow us to say "0 is OK and 1 is also
OK, everything else is bad", so it is not quite appropriate there.
> ...
> So I dunno. I think "set -e" is kind of a dangerous lure.
Yes, I think we should stay away from it. &&-chaining is simpler to
see what is going on, even though it is a bit more to type.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
