Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: >> Something as simple as reading the stdout from a command >> turns out to be rather hard to do right. Doing: >> >> if (!run_command(&cmd)) >> strbuf_read(&buf, cmd.out, 0); >> >> can result in deadlock if the child process produces a large >> amount of output. [...] >> >> Let's introduce a strbuf helper that can make this a bit >> simpler for callers to do right. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net> >> --- >> This is really at the intersection of the strbuf and >> run-command APIs, so you could argue for it being part of >> either It is logically quite like the strbuf_read_file() >> function, so I put it there. > > It does feel like a layering violation. If moved to the run-command > API, it could given one of the following names or something better: > > run_command_capture() > capture_command() > command_capture() > run_command_with_output() > capture_output()
Sound like a good suggestion (but I haven't read the users of the proposed function, after doing which I might change my mind---I'll see). Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
