On April 16, 2015 7:05:04 PM GMT+05:30, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >karthik nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 04/16/2015 02:22 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> This is a tangent, but while we are in the vicinity, we may want to >>> rethink the help message we attach to the '-e' option. Technically >>> the current message is _not_ wrong per-se, but it misses the point. >>> The primary thing the option does is to check the (e)xistence of the >>> named object, and the fact that it does so silently is merely a >>> detail of the operation. The current help text omits the more >>> important part of what the option is. >> >> Would you rather check '-e' and go on to check '-p' or do you merely >> just want a different message. > >I meant just a different message. The point of -e is to see if the >thing exists. It is good to mention _how_ the result is reported >back to the user (i.e. via the exit code, not via an output to the >standard output "exists" vs "missing", for example), but that is >secondary. Telling how it reports is meaningless without telling >what it reports in the first place.
I see what you mean. But I think it's beyond the scope of this patch series. If no one does, I'll work on it > >> ... when a user is giving the '-e' option he just expects a silent >> output if the object exists, hence we rather have the option '-e' >> behave as a mutually exclusive option... > >Yes, and that is in line with the switch to OPT_CMDMODE. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
