Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Hmm, that may be technically correct but it is grossly misleading to > update the existing "was obtained on 2014-04-07" to "was obtained on > 2015-04-27", especially if nothing was actually obtained, isn't it?
That is because you're looking at the patch. The intended audience are people reading the README.Git file, and the text reads just fine then. > I honestly am surprised that, after seeing the announcement about "a > new repository, co-maintainer and multiple contributors", no code > change is made over the past 12 months. That is the point indeed. Michael does not use git-multimail himself, and does not find time to work on it. I'm joining the effort, but currently have no time either. But eventually I'll go through the list of pending pull-requests, and we'll actually get new code. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
