On 04/27/2015 09:05 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > >> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: >> [...] >>> Well, the patch does not update git_multimail.py at all. Requoting >>> the part you omitted from my response >>> >>> $ git rev-list -1 master contrib/hooks/multimail/ >>> b513f71f6043c05c3918e670b332dfa7ec6b2661 >>> >>> which is b513f71f (git-multimail: update to version 1.0.0, >>> 2014-04-07) >>> >>> it matches what "was obtained from the upstream project on >>> 2014-04-07". >> >> Yes, but it also matches "was obtained on 2015-04-27", since only the >> README has changed (the commit message of this patch says: "The only >> changes are to the README files, most notably the list of maintainers >> and the project URL."). >> >>> Or did you forget to include the update to the software in the >>> patch? >> >> The update to the software is empty. > > Hmm, that may be technically correct but it is grossly misleading to > update the existing "was obtained on 2014-04-07" to "was obtained on > 2015-04-27", especially if nothing was actually obtained, isn't it?
I'm sorry to have caused confusion. Matthieu, your explanations have been exactly correct. Let me just add a couple of details: Junio, you asked me (off-list) for an update to README and README.Git. Those two files come from the git-multimail repo, as git-multimail/README and git-multimail/README.Git.template, respectively, so I modified the files in our repo then submitted the corresponding patch to your repo. It's true that only documentation changes are in the patch, but it still seemed like good practice to create a tag and all that. If nothing else, it will make it easier to figure out the baseline for future code drops. There have been a couple of small software changes in git-multimail's master branch, but I didn't include those in the patch I submitted to you because I thought you wouldn't want to have code changes so close to the release. So 1.0.2 is on the newly-created "maint" branch. > I honestly am surprised that, after seeing the announcement about "a > new repository, co-maintainer and multiple contributors", no code > change is made over the past 12 months. I totally understand your disappointment. Mea culpa. That, in fact, is WHY I'm so happy that Matthieu has agreed to help maintain the project. If it's any consolation, none of the user feedback that I have been so remiss in addressing involves serious or security-related bugs. > I would understand it if the description were "The version in this > directory matches the upstream project as of 2015-04-27", though. I think of the contents of contrib/hooks/multimail as a whole, so even if the software hasn't changed, updated documentation *has* been "obtained" from upstream. But feel free to adjust the text in whatever way you like. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
