Eric Sunshine<sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes: > Shouldn't this case also 'die' when rebase.checkLevel is "error"? And, > why doesn't the user get advice about configuring rebase.checkLevel in > this case? Stephen Kelly<steve...@gmail.com> writes: > I sometimes duplicate commits deliberately if I want to split a commit in > two. Matthieu Moy<matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > The more I think about it, the more I think we should either not warn at > all on duplicate commits, or have a separate config variable. Put in common because two config variables would have an effect on the 'die' and advise part.
In this patch we didn't put the 'die' in the duplicate commit part since there was only one config variable and there are cases where the user might want to duplicate commits. After the code reviewing of Eric Sunshine and Stephen Kelly, we also came to the conclusion that we should use two config variables, one about missing commits and the other about duplicate commits. This way if you deliberately want to use duplicate commits, you can just set the value to 'ignore' for duplicate commits and still have 'warn'/'error' for missing commits. Moreover, each part would have its 'die' depending on the value of the corresponding config variable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
