Remi Galan Alfonso <remi.galan-alfo...@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: >> You're using $1 and $2 only to redirect input and output. I would find >> it more elegant to write todo_list_to_sha_list as a filter, and do the >> redirection in the call site (to keep the option of using >> todo_list_to_sha_list in a pipe). > > If I understood correctly, then the calling line would look like: >> todo_list_to_sha_list <"$todo".backup >"$todo".oldsha1 > ? Yes. > Should I do the same for the function warn_file ? > Meaning >> warn_file <"$todo".miss > instead of >> warn_file "$todo".miss If you do so, then warn_file won't be a good name anymore since you'd be able to read from a pipe too. Anyway, it's really a matter of personnal preference. I would keep warn_file as-is and change todo_list_to_sha_list, but feel free to ignore this point if you disagree. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
