Paul Tan <[email protected]> writes:
> Implement applying the patch to the index using git-apply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <[email protected]>
> ---
> builtin/am.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/am.c b/builtin/am.c
> index d6434e4..296a5fc 100644
> --- a/builtin/am.c
> +++ b/builtin/am.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,18 @@ static int is_empty_file(const char *filename)
> return !st.st_size;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * Returns the first line of msg
> + */
> +static const char *firstline(const char *msg)
> +{
> + static struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + strbuf_reset(&sb);
> + strbuf_add(&sb, msg, strchrnul(msg, '\n') - msg);
> + return sb.buf;
> +}
Hmm. This is not wrong per-se but a more efficient way to do it may
be to have a helper function that returns a bytecount of the first
line of the msg, i.e. strchrnul(msg, '\n') - msg. Then a caller can
do
printf("Applying: %.*s", linelen(msg), msg);
instead of
printf("Applying: %s", firstline(msg));
relying on that the firstline() copies the contents to a static
strbuf that does not have to be freed.
> + struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> +
> + cp.git_cmd = 1;
> +
> + argv_array_push(&cp.args, "apply");
> +
> + argv_array_push(&cp.args, "--index");
> +
> + argv_array_push(&cp.args, am_path(state, "patch"));
You seem to like blank lines a lot ;-) While it is a good tool to
separate different groups while grouping related things together,
these three argv-push calls are intimately related, and reads better
without blanks in between.
Looks nicely done so far...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
