Lawrence Siebert <lawrencesieb...@gmail.com> writes: > added test comparing output between git log --count HEAD and > git rev-list --count HEAD
Unless there is a very long list of tests, I'd rather see this squashed with PATCH 2/4. As a reviewer I prefer having code and tests in the same place. > Signed-off-by: Lawrence Siebert <lawrencesieb...@gmail.com> > --- > t/t4202-log.sh | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/t/t4202-log.sh b/t/t4202-log.sh > index 1b2e981..35f8d82 100755 > --- a/t/t4202-log.sh > +++ b/t/t4202-log.sh > @@ -871,4 +871,11 @@ test_expect_success 'log --graph --no-walk is forbidden' > ' > test_must_fail git log --graph --no-walk > ' > > +test_expect_success 'log --count' ' > + git log --count HEAD > actual && > + git rev-list --count HEAD > expect && The weird space is still there. Also, we write ">actual", not "> actual" in the Git coding style. That is actually a rather weak test. rev-list --count interacts with --left-right, so I guess you want to test --count --left-right. Also, some revision-limiting options can reduce the count like git log --grep whatever and you should check that you actually count the right number here. (I don't know this part of the code enough, but I'm not sure you actually deal with this properly) -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
