On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:
>
>> +static int line_length(const char *recs)
>> +{
>> + char *s = strchr(recs, '\n');
>> + return s ? s - recs : strlen(recs);
>> +}
>
> It seems that you guys are discarding this "number of bytes on a
> line, no matter what these bytes are" idea, so this may be moot, but
> is there a guarantee that reading through recs until you happen to
> see a NUL is safe?
>
> Shouldn't the code that accesses a "line" be using the same "from
> here to there", i.e. recs[]->ptr, recs[]->size, interface to avoid
> having to scan the underlying string in an unbounded way?
>
>
I think we're going to make use of xdl_blankline instead of this or
our own "is_emptyline"
Thanks,
Jake
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
