Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > Note: the code now calls merge_recursive_generic() again. Unlike > merge_trees() and merge_recursive(), this function returns 0 upon success, > as most of Git's functions. Therefore, the error value -1 naturally is > handled correctly, and we do not have to take care of it specifically.
I've finished reading through up to this point and I'd stop for now. Some of the patches I didn't look beyond the context presented in the patches, so it is very possible that I missed leaks caused by early returns and things like that, but I didn't see anything glaringly wrong. Looks very promising. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
