Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > If you want, I can break out the subsequent patches into a separate > series.
I do not think that would help anybody, as we'll have to review them anyway. If some of the the later ones were "oops, this earlier step did an incomplete job and here is a fix-up", then squashing them into the step where such a mistake happens may reduce the review load, but I suspect that is not the case (iow, they are enhancements and the earlier ones can stand on their own). > I may have missed something as stupid as an unclosed file handle, after > all. Yes, reviewing the same change over and over, especially if the change is your own, tends to have diminishing rate of bug yields, which is why they need to be reviewed by fresh set of eyes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
