On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Christian Couder
<[email protected]> wrote:
> -static void read_patch_file(struct strbuf *sb, int fd)
> +static int read_patch_file(struct strbuf *sb, int fd)
> {
> if (strbuf_read(sb, fd, 0) < 0)
> - die_errno("git apply: failed to read");
> + return error_errno("git apply: failed to read");
which always returns -1.
> @@ -4425,7 +4426,8 @@ static int apply_patch(struct apply_state *state,
> int res = 0;
>
> state->patch_input_file = filename;
> - read_patch_file(&buf, fd);
> + if (read_patch_file(&buf, fd))
In case a reroll turns out to be needed, check for
"read_patch_file(..) < 0" here,
as we only want to error out in case of errors from that function?
The return value of read_patch_file, is not documented as it seems
trivial at the
moment, i.e.
0 for success
negative values for errors
positive values are currently not returned, but are reserved for future use?
The current implementation is correct as-is, though I think we follow the
"negative values indicate a serious error and positive values are to
be expected,
and not necessarily an error" pattern in lots of other places, so we
could here as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
