On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> + * Try to apply a patch. > + * > + * Returns: > + * -128 if a bad error happened (like patch unreadable) > + * -1 if patch did not apply and user cannot deal with it > + * 0 if the patch applied > + * 1 if the patch did not apply but user might fix it I stopped and wondered when reading this comment, what the difference between -1 and 1 is, as the user is not part of this function. When reading the code, this makes sense, though. So -1 is returned when the user set `apply_with_reject`, 1 otherwise? So the user told us upfront how to deal with certain errors. What is a "bad" error, that generates a -128? (Only when the patch is not syntactically correct? Or are there other -128 errors as well?) Maybe: Returns zero on success, non zero for failing to apply a patch negative values for hard errors, e.g. unreadable patc. Though this is less precise, as it doesn't differentiate between -1 and -128. I dunno. (These are just musings that should not stop going forward with this patch, just some thoughts on the precision of a comment) Thanks, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
