kgyrtkirk commented on a change in pull request #2839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/2839#discussion_r761710984



##########
File path: 
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/calcite/rules/HiveFilterProjectTransposeRule.java
##########
@@ -339,6 +339,11 @@ private void check(Filter filter) {
       final RexNode filterCondition = simplify.simplify(filter.getCondition());
 
       final Set<Integer> inputRefs = 
HiveCalciteUtil.getInputRefs(newCondition);
+      // if the new IS NOT NULL has no input ref, there is redundancy here, 
bail out
+      if (inputRefs.isEmpty()) {

Review comment:
       this is interesting...I think we shouldn't have the  `IS NOT NULL` at 
all.... why don't we run `RexSimplify` in `unknownAsFalse` mode?
   
   we may make that change independently from this change - but `uAF` could 
probably identify more opportunities in case the outer is not an `IS NOT NULL`

##########
File path: 
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/calcite/rules/HiveFilterProjectTransposeRule.java
##########
@@ -339,6 +339,11 @@ private void check(Filter filter) {
       final RexNode filterCondition = simplify.simplify(filter.getCondition());
 
       final Set<Integer> inputRefs = 
HiveCalciteUtil.getInputRefs(newCondition);
+      // if the new IS NOT NULL has no input ref, there is redundancy here, 
bail out

Review comment:
       the above code blindly states that the top level call is an `IS NOT 
NULL` without even checking it
   can we be sure in that? because it seems like it removes the top level call 
without even a check!
   




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to