@b4n Ping 2 :-)
Basically this is the API I currently propose. I believe it's quite nice also
that it doesn't serve for LSP only but it could be used by other plugins too. I
for instance noticed https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/3858 and if somebody
wanted they could use this API for implementing a Tree-sitter backend.
What the API does is that it just simply disables the Geany functionality and
makes the plugin do the work instead. This also reduces the amount of changes
needed in Geany as Geany doesn't have to care what exactly the plugin does.
While in some cases it might be possible to reduce the number of checks whether
the plugin implements certain feature, I didn't include it in this PR - such a
refactoring can come later. Also, there are no docstrings, API bump etc. yet as
the API may change based on the discussion here.
Now the symbol tree. I came to the conclusion that LSP symbols, which we know
nothing about and which are only meant to be blindly displayed in the symbol
tree without any processing, and TM symbols where we really know what they
contain, are fundamentally incompatible and any form of unification will lead
to this kind of ugly code everywhere:
```C
if (tag->is_lsp)
//LSP symbol - do one thing
else
//TM symbol - do other thing
```
I tried this in the extra patches of https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3850
and I don't like the result at all.
So for the symbol tree I propose this:
1. For now, keep using TM for it and wait for users feedback. The thing is that
TM works very well for it and I kind of suspect that nobody will notice
anything.
2. If there are complaints that users actually really want LSP-based symbol
tree, I'd just make a separate "LSP Symbols" tab in the sidebar that would be
implemented completely in the plugin (by stealing most of Geany's symbol tree
code). Even though this means some code duplication, it isn't as bad as making
Geany code ugly and hard to maintain because of the incompatible symbol
representations.
Thoughts?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3849#issuecomment-2132172378
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3849/c2132172...@github.com>
