pitrou commented on a change in pull request #8542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8542#discussion_r521349565
##########
File path: cpp/src/arrow/util/basic_decimal.cc
##########
@@ -395,33 +395,49 @@ BasicDecimal128& BasicDecimal128::operator*=(const
BasicDecimal128& right) {
return *this;
}
-/// Expands the given value into an array of ints so that we can work on
-/// it. The array will be converted to an absolute value and the wasNegative
+/// Expands the given little endian array of uint64_t into a big endian array
of
+/// uint32_t. The value of input array is expected to be non-negative. The
result_array
+/// will remove leading zeros from the input array.
+/// \param value_array a little endian array to represent the value
+/// \param result_array a big endian array of length N*2 to set with the value
+/// \result the output length of the array
+template <size_t N>
+static int64_t FillInArray(const std::array<uint64_t, N>& value_array,
+ uint32_t* result_array) {
+ int64_t next_index = 0;
+ for (int64_t i = N - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ if (value_array[i] != 0) {
+ if (value_array[i] <= std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()) {
+ result_array[next_index++] = static_cast<uint32_t>(value_array[i]);
+ i--;
+ }
+ for (int64_t j = i; j >= 0; j--) {
+ result_array[next_index++] = static_cast<uint32_t>(value_array[j] >>
32);
+ result_array[next_index++] = static_cast<uint32_t>(value_array[j]);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ return next_index;
+}
+
+/// Expands the given value into a big endian array of ints so that we can
work on
+/// it. The array will be converted to an absolute value and the was_negative
/// flag will be set appropriately. The array will remove leading zeros from
/// the value.
-/// \param array an array of length 4 to set with the value
+/// \param array a big endian array of length 4 to set with the value
/// \param was_negative a flag for whether the value was original negative
/// \result the output length of the array
static int64_t FillInArray(const BasicDecimal128& value, uint32_t* array,
bool& was_negative) {
- uint64_t high;
- uint64_t low;
- const int64_t highbits = value.high_bits();
- const uint64_t lowbits = value.low_bits();
-
- if (highbits < 0) {
- low = ~lowbits + 1;
- high = static_cast<uint64_t>(~highbits);
- if (low == 0) {
- ++high;
- }
- was_negative = true;
- } else {
- low = lowbits;
- high = static_cast<uint64_t>(highbits);
- was_negative = false;
- }
-
+ BasicDecimal128 abs_value = BasicDecimal128::Abs(value);
+ was_negative = value.high_bits() < 0;
+ uint64_t high = static_cast<uint64_t>(abs_value.high_bits());
+ uint64_t low = abs_value.low_bits();
+
+ // FillInArray(std::array<uint64_t, N>& value_array, uint32_t* result_array)
is not
+ // called here as the following code has better performance, to avoid
regression on
+ // BasicDecimal128 Division.
if (high != 0) {
if (high > std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()) {
Review comment:
I'm afraid that doesn't answer my question about non-strict inequality,
does it?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
